This question <39|48> overall <41|43> Vansmack: <918|43>.  
  Question 2: Give examples which show that the wealth of a nation can be unrelated or perhaps even opposite to the wealth of the individuals living in that nation.   
  [42] Vansmack: Question number two asks to see if the wealth of a nation can be unrelated to the wealth of the individuals in a nation. I believe that this process happens in many nations. An example is the United States' distribution of wealth. While the U.S is wealthy in the area of strong military to protect the country against other countries it lacks in the enforcement of protecting itself from huge problems going on within the country such as crime, drugs, and gangs. Also just because the government spends money on special programs the programs do not nessessarily benefit all of the citizens. An example would be the space program. Although a lot of money is spent on it,the proportion of Americans it directly benefits is an incredibly small number. Another huge example to back up Adam Smith's theory here in America is the Homeless problem. The U.S. is on of the most advanced nations in the world -- yet this epidemic strikes nearly, if not all, of the U.S.'s urban areas and even beyond.   
  Hans: Good points. Your examples show that the United States government does not even care about the welfare of the individuals living there. It spends money on things which are unnecessary for their needs and does not spend money to make their situation better.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: