This question <926|575> overall <531|533> Scarlett: <453|533>.  
  Question 182: Why is the occasional exchange of surplus products between tribes not an exchange of commodities but one of “products”?   
  [532] Scarlett: If someone is producing a commodity, it is specifically for trade or exchange. The basis of the market is that it is necessary to trade your commodities for other commodities in order to survive. We are not able to function without the items that we trade for. As a result, people involved in a market become dependant on that market and on the exchange values of the commodities they produce. The explanation for why an occasional exchange of surplus products between tribes is an exchange of products rather than commodities lies in the word surplus. “Surplus” implies that the tribes are able to subsist on what they produce themselves, and only exchange what they don't use. Therefore, they are not dependent on the market.   
  Hans: Excellent. This is the kind of “translation” of Marx's text into everyday language which I have been looking for.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: