This question <22|27> overall <23|25> Dew: <330-32|93>.  
  Question 49: Is the magnitude of value of a commodity determined by the quantity of abstract labor necessary to produce it, or by the quantity of other commodities against which it can be exchanged?   
  [24] Dew: Measurement of Magnitude of Value   The word value is existing in the word use-value. If we do not consider the use-value of commodities, then as a result, only a fact that the commodities are the products of labor is left.   
  Marx says that a commodity is the product of abstract labor. Therefore, I say that value of a commodity is determined by the quantity of abstract labor necessary to produce it. It doesn't mean that a commodity which was produced by unskilled and lazy workers has more value in it because it takes more time for them to produce it. Abstract labor, Marx defines, is socially necessary labor required to produce a commodity under the normal production conditions with the average degree of skill and intensity of prevailing labour in that society. Therefore, commodities such as TV and VCR, which contain equal quantity of labor, have the same value. The value of a commodity will remain constant if the required labor-time to produce the commodity also will stay constat. If, for example, the required labor time for a production of a commodity has became shorter , then the value of the commodity also has became less valued.   
  Hans: See my [27]  
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: