This question <135|135> overall <134|136> Pizza: <96|290>.  
  Exam Question 90: How does the social scientist's analysis of the substance of value differ from what the commodities tell each other in the exchange?   
  [135] Pizza: substance of value   The substance of value from the perspective of a social scientist is that value which is separate from the exchange relation between two commodities. You note that we should skip over Marx's analogy to the butric acid and propyl formate but lets apply this structure again. Lets take two bandanna's each same size, shape etc.. identical in all material fact excepting their colors. One's color is red and the other is blue. The exchange relations are equivalent. A gang member of the bloods walks into a store and looks at the two bandana's and having no value for the blue bandanna purchases the red and walks out, why? The substance of value for the red bandana was its embodiedment of value in the eyes of the blood's as a representation of their neihborhood, membership in a unit of brotherhood that only held its value within their own society. This is not a quantifiable value as the exchange value the blue bandana equates the same but does not embody the substance of value that the red bandana did. The substance value not only is unrelated to the quantifiable exchange but is additionaly dependent upon those in which the embodiedment of its value rests.   
  Hans: You missed the Question, and your confusion between use value and substance of value is a serious blunder. But you brought in interesting example of the relativity of use value.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: