This question <277|346-1> overall <304|306> Slacker: <215|91>.  
  Exam Question 213: Argue why C-M-C is an independent act, while M-C-M is a link in a chain.   
  [305] Slacker: Addition to 213   I think there is more to it than Bandit has addressed. C-M-C is independent in the sense that its motivation is to an specific end, the sale of one commodity for the purchase of another. This is done to satisfy some want. M-C-M is a capitalist venture where the goal is to use X quanity of money to buy some commodity that you will sell for Y quantity of money. The goal is that Y > X. This is the generation of profit and for the capitalist the reason for existance. This is what makes it a link in the chain.   
  Hans: Your explanation of C-M-C is better than Bandit's, but Jupiter's [277] has already said the same thing. On the other hand, Bandit's [267] has a better explanation than yours why M-C-M is a link in a chain: simply because the second M looks exactly like the first, and it is ready to enter the same cycle over again.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: