This question <32|61> overall <52|54> Dragonfly: <9|242-2>.  
  Question 53: The value of a commodity does not increase if it is made by a slow or inept laborer. Explain carefully why not. Whose decision is it to do things this way? How is it enforced?   
  [53] Dragonfly: mechanism of production   THe mechanism described by Hans is complex and multi-faceted but as I understand it , Capital is at the very heart of it. In a capitalist market, the worker, by and large, does not own her/his mode of production. THe mode of production is owned by the capitalist. The capitalist is a capitalist by virtue of having amassed enough capital to employ a more cost-effective mode of production: i.e. build a factory, use assembly-line techniques, purchase better machinery and/or tools. With these more effective( from the standpoint of labor) modes of production, the labor investment in each commodity produced is less and consequently can be sold for a lower price. THe independent worker producing the same commodity as the capitalist will be unable to offer their commodity at the price of the capitalist and still have the exchange value of their commodity commeasurate with the labor they have invested in it. The capitalist will continually undersell the independent worker, eventually driving them out of business, eliminating the competition. With no competition (and assuming a laissez-fair government), the capitalist would be free to price their commodity at whatever price the market will bear, depending on the use-value of the commodity. Not only is the worker now expected to pay whatever the capitalist wants, but her/his own mode of production has been eliminated. THe only commodity the worker has left to sell is her/his labor and raw materials like labor are less valuable than other commodities. THe producer becomes the consumer and the capitalist owns the mode of production. Why? Because they had the capital in the first place.   
  Hans: Although you did not answer the Question which was asked, you are getting a good grade, for two reasons: (1) the mechanism which you describe is a very important one. It is really much more important to understand this mechanism than the answer to Question 53. (2) Your description of this mechanism is a little different than what one usually reads, which shows me that you came to it through independent thinking. I think your description is quite accurate.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: