This question <70|96> overall <70|72> Fritz: <70|78>.  
  Question 53: The value of a commodity does not increase if it is made by a slow or inept laborer. Explain carefully why not. Whose decision is it to do things this way? How is it enforced?   
  [71] Fritz: Courtney Love   Emma wrote in [61]  
  For Marx a commodity is a use value which is produced for sale in the market and thus has an exchange value. The “value” referred to in the question is the exchange value.   
  Doesn't “value” refer to the amount of abstract labor contained in the good or service. For example, the price (exchange value) can fluctuate, but its value remains constant.   
  of “average human labor power” which is a social interpretation and measurement of the abstrac labor time necessary to produce a commodity. It is an attempt at establishing a norm against which to measure the productivity and value of other labor.   
  Abstract labor is characterized as the general expenditure of human energy.   
  if we wanted to quantify how many brake shoes are produced using one hour of abstract labor, how would we go about it?   
  would we pluck 100 people at random and check their productivity? or, would we find 100 people who are adept at this task and check their productivity?   
  you provide the beginnings of an answer:   
  “prevailing socially normal conditions of production and with the socially average degree of skill and intensity,”   
  but question remains -- if I were such a poor builder of brake shoes that no capitalist would ever hire me, would I still be included in determining the amount of abstract labor needed for creating a brake shoe?   
  if I am a very adept builder of brake shoes, and yet my personal supply curve is such that I will never be demanded, am I included in the determination of the abstract labor necessary for producing brake shoes?   
  basically, my question boils down to whether the definition of abstract labor is ultimately based upon the supply and demand for commodities.   
  or if it simply a question of the skill and intensity of the average human?   
  Better to use Courtney Love and Jackson Pollack.   
  Was not Jackson Pollack the artist dripper?   
  Cheers. Fritz   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: