This question <51|46> overall <40|42> Zeek: <467|72>.  
  Question 93: If the first Chapter is such a systematic discussion of value, why is it then called “Commodities” and not “Value”?   
  [41] Zeek: Why commodity, not value?   Marx throughout this first Chapter has been referring to Commodities rather than Value. Upon reading what Marx refers to when talking about value we understand that value takes on many different forms. Marx often referred to an expression that, “20 yards of linen = 1 coat.” Here he is talking about commodities and their values. The use value of the linen is expressed in the coat. Linen itself has no use value, until you put it with another item (commodity). To understand the value we need to look first at commodity. Marx expresses value through commodities. Marx states that in order for something to have value it must have some form of utility associated with it. According to Marx the only way that a commodity can make itself known is through its exchange value. Values of an item can only be shown through that of a commodity. Linen in the coat has value, but alone its value is not apparent. This is why Marx refers to commodity rather than value in his first Chapter.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: