This question <60|67> overall <64|66> Gemni: <427|141-5>.  
  Question 147: What is the progress of the Money form as compared to the General Equivalent form?   
  [65] Gemni: general equivalent form to the money form   In order to understand the transition from the universal equivalent, or general equivalent form, to that of the money form, one must first understand the the how we got to the universal equivalent form. In this manner it will be easier to understand the subtle transition from the universal equivalent form to the money form.   
  In Marx's description of the simple form, or form A, 20 yards of linen equaled 1 coat, 10 lb of tea, 40 lb of coffee, etc. This is the first form of the commodity but it quickly changes into B, the expanded form because in the Marx's account, the linen weaver has need for more than just linen or coats to live. In the expanded form, one must realize that the linen, which is now the expanded form, can be replaced by any other commodity, so long as it will serve as the same function that the linen does. The third transition, form C or the universal equivalent form, comes about when the linen serves as the measure of all other commodities. Once linen as taken the form of the universal equivalent, all other commodities are now excluded from becoming the universal equivalent. This new universal equivalent form will of course have to be socially accepted. this one specific commodity must have gained “objective fixity and general social validity” (p-54). The only difference in form C and form D, the money form, is that now, another commodity, has been substituted as the universal equivalent form of the commodities. This is gold in Marx's example. Gold is now a “specifically predetermined commodity” (p55). Once gold distinguishes itself as the supreme commodity, having the greatest value expression of all other commodities, it is now considered the money commodity. Because gold has this “right” it now becomes the measure value of all other commodities. Marx's theory of the money form is true even today, it only differs in that the universal equivalent form is no longer a commodity, but an abstract unit of a value measure, the dollar.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: