This question <69|73> overall <71|73> Tolkien: <443|114>. graded A  
  Question 155: Assume there are 51 butchers in a barter society, and none of them is a chess player. Does this mean that the game of chess is not one of the Particular equivalents in the Expanded form of value of meat?   
  [72] Tolkien: As stated in 156:1 “Every commodity, such as coat, tea, iron, etc., counts, in the expression of value of the linen, as an equivalent and therefore a physical incarnation of value.” In this particular case the physical incarnation of value lies within labor. It takes both labor to produce units of meat, as well as to produce a unit of a chess board. The equivalents in the commodities are equivalent in the value of the labor to produce. I agree with Chilote in the statement that “comparisons between commodities is endless.” But I disagree with the final answer [69], “If none of the butchers plays chess, they would not accept a chess board for their meat.” If they exchange the meat for a chess board, then exchanged the board for a good knife, the butchers might be able to produce meat more efficently. Thus, we reach a better general form of value by optimizing equivalent choices.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: