| This question <84|84> overall <85|87> Hans: <85|94>. |
| Question 163: The difference between the Money form and the General equivalent form is small; nevertheless it has important implications. Elaborate. |
| [86] Hans: General Equivalent becomes Incarnation of Wealth Sara [84] is completely right: the money form has much more “objectivity” than a general equivalent that is established case by case. This creates a “novelty” which has “important implications for capital” because now it becomes rational to accumulate that money commodity, not merely as a means to facilitate exchange, but as the incarnation of social wealth. This is what capitalism is all about. |
|
|
|||||