This question <26|18> overall <15|17> Stonewall: <13|50>.  
  Exam Question 45: How can one come to the conclusion that exchange-value is not something inherent in the commodity?   
  [16] Stonewall: exchange-value inherentness.   As Marx indicates, commodities are exchanged at wildly different proportions at different times and places. Now if the exchange value was inherent in the commodity you would get the same exchange rate for the item in question throughout the world. But that is not the case, people are the market, they make the decision that best suits their needs. A industrial lawnmower is going to be a whole hell of a lot more productive sitting in some farmer's or greenskeeper's yard than at my house where there is about 1/2 acre of property. That lawnmower would be of no worth to me. Marx goes on to say that the exchange value is “something accidental and purely relative.” Just as I pointed out. Other factors besides the commodity determine the exchange value. The place, if there are other items which may be substitutes, who is involved. Just because something exists everywhere doesn't mean that the value is the same everywhere.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: