This question <21|23> overall <21|23> Hans: <20|26>.  
  Exam Question 45: How can one come to the conclusion that exchange-value is not something inherent in the commodity?   
  [22] Hans: Labor theory of value versus demand and supply.   In response to Catfish's [21] I'd like to remind everyone that in the readings presently assigned, Marx gives a derivation of the labor theory of value. He argues that in the long run, the exchange-value is based on the labor content of the commodity. It is therefore not dependent on the need for the commodity at all. The need only determines how much will be produced, and it may have short-run effects on prices before the quantities have had time to adjust. But in the long run, exchange-values are based on the social cost of the product, and this is only the labor-time, all other costs are ignored by the one-dimensional market mechanism.   
  This is not the result of a social agreement, but it is the result of the blind competition of the private producers.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: