This question <22|26> overall <22|24> Cowboy: <625|86>.  
  Exam Question 45: How can one come to the conclusion that exchange-value is not something inherent in the commodity?   
  [23] Cowboy: Exchange-Value inherent.   In response to Stonewall [16] and Catfish [21]. I think that they both had very excellent examples of how the exchange value could be different to each individual depending on what they thought was valuable themselves. To answer this question we need to understand what Marx believes about commodities and their exchange values. Marx believes that a value is associated with the exchange value of a commodity and that the value of commodity comes from the labor that was put into that particular product (what time and effort was used in producing the commodity). I have tried to think of a good example of what I could use to demonstrate this but I think that the best way is to just explain that the exchange value is not something inherent in the commodity because you can not put a exchange value on labor because each person's idea of value labor is different. According to Marx labor is what gives the commodity its value.   
  Hans: You made an important intervention, similar to my [22] which was submitted just a few minutes earlier.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: