| |
[555] Hans: Don't confuse relative and extra surplus-value! Clay [552] confuses relative surplus-value with extra
surplus-value, but even if one replaces every occurrence of
the word “relative surplus-value” with “extra surplus-value”
it still isn't quite right. Because the extra surplus-value
does not disappear altogether; if the innovations
bring more efficient ways to reproduce the workers'
livelihood, then the necessary part of the labor day
shortens, and this effect is what Marx calls “relative
surplus-value”. |
|