This question <85|79> overall <77|79> Eatsono: <62|153>.  
  Question 112: In Contribution, p. [mecw29]270:1, Marx writes: “Although use-values serve social needs and therefore exist within a social context, they do not express a social relation of production.” Why not?   
  [78] Eatsono: Use-value and social relations.   Marx writes “although use-values serve social needs and therefore exist within a social context, they do not express a social relation of production.” This statement refers to the commodity as a whole. The production of a commodity is irrelevant, until the final product, because a commodity may need to take several steps before becoming a finished commodity to trade or sell (e.g. human babies, fruits, vegetables...). Lets take a pumpkin seed. This commodity is not yet finished, but through human interaction watering and nuturing the pumpkin seed it will one day grow to become a pumpkin or a commodity. The human interaction is not associated with the finished commodity, a pumpkin. The commodity is a pumpkin and all the use and exchange values of that pumpkin, not of the production of the pumpkin. The “form” and the physical palpable existence of the commodity is a staple for food, no relation to its production.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: