This question <91|99> overall <94|96> KStone: <737|176>.  
  Question 125: Why doesn't Marx say that the simplest value relation is that between commodity and money?   
  [95] KStone: commodity and money.   Money in Marx's view is the concept of value for commodities and the universal confusion of exchanges for everything. Money exchanged for a commodity is much easier to calculate rather than trying to judge equal amounts of labor put into different objects. Marx sees complications when money is calculated as a ratio of how much utility an individual receives from a material object. This is due to variables, which happen when physical qualities are given to commodities in order to determine their use value. These physical qualities can't be directly compared to a quantitative sense, or reflection of personal use in a capitalist society. The only element that is common to all commodities is their pure form of exchange values, or the amount of money an individual is willing to pay for one unit of a particular commodity. Complications arise when the price of a certain commodity is given an inherent relation, physical characteristic, or useful qualitative attribute. Therefore money exchange for a commodity is better represented as an attribute of the commodity itself rather then an attribute of utility one receives from the commodity.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: