| |
The only comment I can make is to draw your attention to
a place where AntonioGramsci's [3] is a little ambiguous.
Sometimes AntonioGramsci seems to argue that certain rich
people are too dumb to be this rich (with the unspoken
implication that it is ok to be rich as long as you are
smart), but then he also argues that nobody should have as
much wealth as certain individuals do in this society. This
second argument is the Marxist argument. Some progressives
and Marxists even argue that in an ideal society a person's
wealth should not depend on that person's intelligence at
all. What are the pros and cons here? If you want to
discuss this, it certainly fits under question 14. |
|