This question <563-2|563-12> overall <563-4|563-6> IvanIvanovich: <532|563-6>. graded A–  
  Question 370: The empirical appearance of the processes of sale and purchase encourages a naive mistake, which makes it difficult to understand the metamorphosis of the commodity. Which mistake?   
  [563-5] IvanIvanovich: The mistake made by people and referred to by Marx is when we equate the exchange of a commodity for money as being an exchange between two commodities. This is an inaccurate statement. We do not receive the value of the gold for the value of our product, say a pair of shoes. No, the value of the shoes changes into the use-value of the next product that we intend to purchase with the gold. I don't give away my shoes, I keep them but in the form of gold which can be used for exchange. I am using gold as a value, not unto itself, but as a means to acquire the use value of say, flour. It was mentioned that this is one of the biggest oversights of mainstream economists.   
  Hans: I think your third sentence should read: “We do not receive the use-value of the gold for the value of our product, say a pair of shoes.”   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: