This question <76|58> overall <83|85> Hans: <83|89>.  
  Question 142: Why doesn't Marx say that the simplest value relation is that between commodity and money?   
  [84] Hans: Wheat and sheep society.   What Pike describes in [76] is not a commodity-producing society. In Pike's society, there would be a traditional exchange ratio between wheat and sheep, which is taught to children when they are little, and all exchanges would be made at this traditional rate. If the wheat crop is destroyed by hail, then the price would not go up but the shepherd would help his neighbor. Same situation if the sheep catch a disease. If either has more than usual, the prices would not go down but they would throw a party and invite some guests. Money would be completely unnecessary. These people don't produce for the exchange, they produce together and consume together and enjoy their free time, and the exchange is just the ritual which they use to share their products. Capitalists would be impossible in this society: who wants more wheat or sheep than they need? It is only extra work.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: