This question <62|62> overall <60|65> Kowski: <62|62>. graded A  
  Question 56: First give Marx's arguments how one can come to the conclusion that exchange-value is not something inherent in the commodity. Then reproduce, in your own words, Marx's rebuttal that, despite these arguments, exchange-value seems to be something inherent to the commodity after all.   
  [62] Kowski: Exchange Value.   Marx describes how one could conclude that exchange value is not an inherent characteristic of a commodity. Because goods can be exchanged at varying amounts, times, and places — things that are external to the commodity itself and are constantly changing, — the exchange value seems to come from these external conditions of the exchanges and are, as Marx puts it, ‘accidental’ and ‘purely relative’. While it is easy to understand how one can reach the conclusion that exchange value is not an intrinsic characteristic of a commodity based on these arguments, Marx counters with another argument claiming that exchange value is actually inherent in a commodity. Every transaction that takes place trades an amount of something for an amount of something else. While the amounts of each good are different, they are equal in worth. This equality in worth depending on the goods being traded shows that the exchange value is inherent in each commodity. The exchange value cannot be expressed unless the commodity is known, thus it is inherent.   
  Hans: Excellent answer.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: