| |
[65] Gza: natural worth. I was wondering if anyone can help me understand
Marx's definition or understanding of “natural”. I
know that there is some connotation to Locke's
definition but does Marx draw a distinction between
“natural worth” which he says is to supply the
necessities of life and what is “natural”? In other
words is the “natural” in the term “natural worth”
different from the definition of “natural” attached to
some worth other than the “worth” in “natural worth”?
I just find the term “natural” troubling because
historically the idea of nature and what is natural
has changed so much and even within a context the term
seems abstract and illusive, let alone attaching it to
“worth”. In other words, |
|