| |
This is a difficult question and I am not sure whether I know the
right answer. “Mode of expression” seems to be the weaker term:
something is an expression of something else if it is a sign that the
other thing is happening. Look at question 633 on p. 498 of the
Annotations, and the text to which it refers. The form of appearance
of value is much more than just an expression: it is the handle
through which the invisible value is established and also exerts its
influence. I think MK's [80] shows an excellent understanding, and
also Keltose's [75] definitely goes in the right direction. But
Keltose should have worked on his or her formulations a little better;
after all, this is a communications and writings course. |
|