This question <566|128> overall <125|128> Jimmy: <99|158>.  
  Question 138: If the first chapter is such a systematic discussion of value, why is it then called “Commodities” and not “Value”?   
  [127] Jimmy: By labeling value as a commodity rather than the former, it can take the form of something of a measureable worth. Whereas the name ‘value’ is something that is different for all individuals and firms. Because it is a subjective term, value must be changed to a measurable term. As with other questions the value or use-value of a certain good is only measured by its use. I could value a puddle of water, unless someone else feels the same about that puddle of water it is only of value to me. If it is then changed to be a commodity such as drinking water, not just something with a personal value, then it can be used to trade. Or at least something of real worth. Commodities are traded, values are different for most people and items.   
  Hans: The social relation which Marx calls “value” is not a subjective term.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: