| |
[544] Elliot: In looking over the annotations and the pdf version of Capital, I struggled
trying to come to a concise answer to the question. I state that Marx
believes that a commodity is an extension of the person who created the
commodity. By this I meant that the commodity has a human element to them
and therefore the extension of the creator. I failed to mention, that the
only way the commodities can have relative “dialogue” is on a level of
exchange-value. The commodities in no way can have a realization of their
use-value, how could they? After all, use-values can fluctuate depending on
the individual interested in a specific commodity. The only possible
“dialogue” a commodity could have is on a level of actual exchange value
against another commodity. |
|