| This question <7|7> overall <5|7> Jazz: <1191|50>. |
| Question 59: Are there other places in Capital where Marx says that the exchange values seem accidental? |
| [6] Jazz: No inherent exchange-values. The exchange proportion between commodities is purely relative. It does not come from the commodities themselves, but from the relationship between one good and another. | Originally: Re: [3] Deadline approaching The exchange between commodities is purley relative. The exchange does not come from the commodities themselves, but from the relationship between one good and another. |
| In other words, commodities cannot have inherent exchange values. Values are placed in exchange between a place and time. No empirical evidence can be provided between exchange values. This is how Marx comes to the conclusion that exchange values are accidental | The point being that commodities cannot inherent exchange values. Values are placed in exchange between a place and time. No imperical evidence can be provided between exchange values. Which is where Marx comes up with accidental exchange values |
| Hans: I could only edit part of your message, because I was unable to guess what you meant with the two sentences “Values are placed in exchange between a place and time. No empirical evidence can be provided between exchange values.” |
|
|
|||||