This question <110|110> overall <112|114> Hans: <109|125>.  
  Question 242: Whether the commodity is “mysterious” or not is a value judgment which can neither be proved nor disproved. Do you agree? What would Marx say about this?   
  [113] Hans: According to the Labor Theory of Value, Costs are Smaller than Value.   Dyoung [110] gives the following description of the process by which commodities are valued: “it simply takes x amount of labor and other costs to create the commodity, so therefore the commodity costs y.” This suggests that the value of a commodity is determined by its cost (with labor costs being a large part of this cost). This is not the same as Marx's labor theory of value! According to Marx's theory, workers add more value to the product than they get in wages. I.e., the labor costs systematically underestimate the value created by direct labor. I tried to say this already in [45]. This is one of the most basic things you need to understand about Marx's theory (or any classical labor theory of value, for instance Ricardo). Don't expect a good grade if you don't understand this.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: