This question <204|210> overall <205|207> Marcellus: <103|207>.  
  Question 54: The use-value of a commodity is the utility one gets from using it; the exchange-value is the utility one gets from using those things one can trade the commodity for. Right or wrong?   
  [206] Marcellus: Where is it?   “The usefulness of a thing makes it a use-value” (Marx, 126). Therefore when question 54 states that “the use-value of a commodity is the utility one gets from using it,” this rings true. However when it says “the exchange-value is the utility one gets from using those things one can trade the commodity for,” this is wrong. As Hans points out in the discussion on page 18, “the exchange-value of a commodity does not come from its use-value. And it certainly does not come from the use-value of the other commodity.” Marx says, “exchange-value manifests itself as something totally independent of . . . use-value. But if we abstract from . . . use-value, there remains . . . value. The common factor . . . in the exchange-value of the commodity, is therefore its value” (Marx 128). And this value comes from, “the amount of labour socially necessary . . . for its production” (Marx, 129). Simply put, exchange-value of a commodity is determined by the amount of work put into it.   
  Hans: Your in-class answer has another good point demonstrating that exchange-value does not come from use-value: “the exchange-value arises when the commodity owner wants nothing to do with the commodity but exchange it, although it better have utility for the person to whom it is being exchanged.”   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: