| |
[270] ZACH: Commodities worth Gold. Assuming that we are comparing the commodity to gold, then I
believe that yes. As the book says, “although invisible, the
value of iron, linen and corn exists in these very articles: it is
signified through their equality with gold, even though this relation
with gold exists only in their heads, so to speak.” If I am
understanding correctly, then whatever the owner of the commodity
feels his commodity is worth, in his head, compared to gold, that is
the price he/she is going to charge for that commodity. If gold is
the value that we are comparing the commodity to, then the owner is of
course going to try and charge the full amount for the commodity that
he feels it is worth. |
|