This question <709|715> overall <710|714> Kalmerico: <652|51>.  
  Question 36: Why is the usefulness for human life attributed to the thing as if it was a property of the thing itself?   
  [713] Kalmerico: Humans are only good if they make money.   Human life is treated no differently than what Marx refers to as the thing, which is a good or an article. In the annotations it states that, “In the first phase, the human is the agent in control, in the second phase, the human has become the consumer of the beneficial properties of the thing. The individual's ability to use external things to serve his or her needs has become a power of the thing itself.” The power of the thing is great as humans need the thing to survive. The thing can come in the form of food, clothing, shelter, or any other good that allows humans to function in life. Workers are a slave to the thing as they use all their labor-power in creating the thing, and then use their wage to buy the thing. Workers do not own the thing that they themselves produce, the capitalist does. A quote from John Locke, found in Capital, states that “The natural worth of anything consists in its fitness to supply the necessities, or serve the conveniences of human life.” In other words, the use-value of humans supply necessities. The labor-power of humans is bought and sold just like any other commodity on the market, and humans sell their labor-power only to have the ability to earn a wage and buy commodities for themselves to ensure their survival in a capitalistic society. Capitalism is a very exploitative society where humans are slaves to the thing. In capitalism, a human life is only worth the profit it creates, otherwise it is of no use to society and somewhat of a burden.   
 
 
 
  Students enrolled for Econ 5080 in 2009fa are invited to give feedback to the above message
Pseudonym:      UofU ID:  
Text: