| |
[715] Walmart: Re: Humans are only good if they make money. I think this is a very difficult question to answer, and perhaps
the reason no one has chosen to tackle it in the past. While I agree
with Kalmerico's points on labor power in [713], I feel that there has to
be something more to human life, as far as Marx is concerned. If
non-human modifications don't create value in a commodity, then the
attribute should be elevated above just the good or the article.
Unless the thing is a separate entity, which is consumed by humans in
the second phase, as told by the annotations, in which case the
divisions are clear enough, and no other concepts are violated by this
line of thinking. |
|